I generally work assuming that my final version is going to be a reasonably big print, so the first one loses a lot because of that -- I think you need a lot more detail before the photo starts to make sense. The second image isn't so dependent on texture so it works at low resolution without difficulty.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-01 09:58 am (UTC)The second image though - wow. Just wow.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-01 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-01 04:12 pm (UTC)http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0n0chrom3
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-01 04:11 pm (UTC)http://www.flickr.com/photos/m0n0chrom3
I generally work assuming that my final version is going to be a reasonably big print, so the first one loses a lot because of that -- I think you need a lot more detail before the photo starts to make sense. The second image isn't so dependent on texture so it works at low resolution without difficulty.