compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)

Hi folks,

I put up a new post on Patheos on Thursday, but have been flat-out busy so I’ve not linked it before now. Here it is, should you be so inclined as to read it:

The Gentrification of Poverty -- Digital painting by Sarah Thompson (source textures courtesy, under license)Queer of Swords: The Gentrification of Poverty

The essay this time is about gentrification and about poverty, but also about the weird intersection of the two, where people are convinced by society that they are doing well when, in fact, objectively they are actually living on the edge of poverty.

This might seem a little odd, particularly to someone not living somewhere mindbogglingly expensive like London, New York or Silicon Valley, but these days it really is possible to make a six figure salary and yet have not much in the way of disposable income, not enough money for savings, no way to buy property or to put a child through school, and to be close enough to the edge that a couple of missed pay checks would result in homelessness. The same salary somewhere much cheaper might well lead to more traditional financial security, but good luck finding a job paying >$100k in such places.

Figuring our why this happens is outside the scope of the Patheos article, but basically it really breaks down to looking at where the big chunks of money disappear to. First and foremost, it’s being sucked up by property — either you’re paying into a mortgage, usually as a consequence of vastly inflated property prices, or you’re paying rent, in which case you’re basically handing over (in the Bay Area particularly) more than half your income to someone else, with nothing long term in return.

I suspect that thereĀ areĀ solutions, but they are sufficiently unconventional that there is too much resistance, both within ourselves and from the society around us, to make the changes necessary. I’ve been fascinated by the tiny house movement for some time (Google it if you’ve not yet heard the term) — I think that, practically speaking, this kind of radical downsizing probably is the only practical answer, but it has a flaw. Owning a tiny house when everyone else is paying ten times as much for a conventional house works great. However, when 80% of people have downsized, this will just cause the market to optimize upward, so it will probably end up costing just as much to live in a tiny house as it currently does to live in a McMansion, except that we’ll be living in a tiny house. This is exactly what I mean by the gentrification of poverty — we are forced into poverty by a system that is taking away our security and bleeding all of us dry, so there is a danger that if we allow ourselves to end up in that kind of gilded poverty, we might not notice and might not say, hey, no, enough is enough, quit that shit, we’re going to stand up for our rights.

Please note: this was cross-posted from my main blog at -- If you want me to definitely see your replies, please reply there rather than here.

#Musing, #QueerofSwords
compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)

Hi folks,

After skipping a column due to Life Happening, I have a new column up on Patheos. This time I’m talking about True Names. Neoplatonism for the internet age. All your data are belong to Facebook and the NSA. That kind of thing. Have at!

We are Cat!Queer of Swords: True Name, True Identities

True Names have power. This is an idea that has been debated by philosophers for millennia, but what does this mean for the Internet age? What are the deeper consequences of the Facebook real names fight?

[ Read more on Patheos ]

Please note: this was cross-posted from my main blog at -- If you want me to definitely see your replies, please reply there rather than here.



compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)

January 2016

3 45 6789
10111213 141516
24 252627282930


RSS Atom
Page generated Oct. 21st, 2017 09:09 pm

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags