compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)
[personal profile] compilerbitch
... is surprisingly hard work.

I made my first ever attempt and mounting photos in a proper mount today, rather than my more usual cheating and just chucking them in a clip frame. This is something I've wanted to be able to do for a while, but I was forced to get around to it because the photography club I just joined require prints to be framed in order for them to be eligible for competition entry. So, after amassing the necessary (and in a couple of cases unnecessary) bits of equipment, I gave it my first whirl today.

The first thing I'll say is that without a proper mat cutter, just completely and utterly forget it. Not going to happen. I tried to trim a piece of mat board with an xacto knife, and it would barely even cut it, even pressing quite hard and making about 20 or 30 passes. The chances of being able to do that accurately enough and repeatably enough to cut a mat successfully are, well, zero. I made a trip to a local art supply store in Sunnyvale, Aarons, and bought myself a Logan Compact Mat Cutter. It basically looks much like a paper trimmer, but with a few twists. It comes with a 90 degree knife and a 45 degree knife, both of which look a bit like a small woodworking plane, and which run along the rail of the mat cutter itself. Firstly, I must say that it takes a surprising amount of force to cut mat board in a single stroke -- after an afternoon of messing around, resulting in only three matted prints, one of which was basically not really usable, both my arms are hurting, and my wrists and hands are having a bit of a moan in sympathy.

For my first attempt, I picked a nice, smallish print (a bit bigger than 10x8), and decided to mat it for an 11x14 frame I'd had lying around for a while since I picked it up cheap at Walmart. The frame itself was quite nice, but the mat it came with was, er, a bit eye burning, so it wasn't going near any of my photos, thank you very much. The first job was cutting the mat board to size -- it comes in huge sheets that are actually too big to fit in the mat cutter, so I had to cut one of them to size roughly with a pair of hand scissors and quite a bit of brute force and ignorance. This came after an initial (completely unsuccessful) attempt with the xacto knife I mentioned previously. Anyway, I ended up with two bits of somewhat wonky mat board cut to something laughingly vaguely approximating 11x14, so next step was to mount the photo to the backing board. I initially tried to use the photo corners I'd bought on [livejournal.com profile] doseybat's advice, but basically found them far too fiddly and not really secure enough for a print of this size. I think it would have been OK for a 6 x 4 or smaller, but anything 10x8 or above is just a bit too weighty. I folded and used acid free artist's tape instead. OK, the conservators out there will probably be pointing an (archival grade, acid free) bone at me and cursing me unto the seventh generation right now, but I just wanted the thing done at that point. Anyway, after a bit of measuring (big mistake), I taped the photo down, and proceeded to measure where the cutout should go. Which I made a total arse of, frankly, but anyway. I then used the 45 degree cutter to cut out the bevelled bit of the front part of the mat -- this turned out to be easy enough, but when I turned it over to look, the knife hadn't cut cleanly so the front surface was jagged. I ditched that attempt, then after a bit of messing about realised that the knife blade was slightly damaged and had a bit of an indentation just where the paper surface should be. I undid the blade cover and flipped the blade over, exposing a fresh edge -- this time, a few tests on offcuts showed it to come up with a nice clean edge. I junked that mat window and cut another one, then glued the mount together. I found that the rubber solution glue didn't work well, or at all, then I read the tin and realised it was supposed to be dry mount contact adhesive, so I then properly painted both halves with glue, waited for it to dry fully, then sandwiched the mount together and pressed down hard. This time, it worked fine, so I left some heavy stuff on it for a while and then put it in the frame. At which point, it became horribly obvious how much of an arse I'd made of the measurement -- the window was clearly not a rectangle, and it wasn't even actually central. Dur.

OK, second attempt. Different print, also 11x14. This time, it worked beautifully. I made a much better attempt at trimming the mat boards to size, so cutting the window was much easier. I used the guide fence on the mat cutter to get the edges exactly the same width this time (after having realised that this was a good idea). With the fixed blade and the non-crap measuring, this time it actually worked. Next step was to loosely sandwich the print between the backing board and the mat. Holding the mat and backing board together, I jiggled the print around until it was in the right place, then put a weight on it in the middle so I could take the mat window away without the print moving. 4 pieces of artist's tape later, the print was in place. A bit of glue on the back of the window and on the corners and edges of the backing board, let them dry, then make the sandwich, jiggle around until in position and press down, hey presto, perfect mounted print. Woohoo! I should embarrassedly admit that this much took me about 5 hours.

After a bit of psyching up, I decided to mount one of the competition prints for week after next. This time, I was going for 16x20, so it took a whole sheet of mat board this time. At $13 per sheet, this isn't cheap -- I reckon with ink, paper, mat board and other materials, a 16x20 matted print has a base cost of at least $20, not counting about an hour of time. I went through the same stages, exactly the same technique as for the smaller print, and I'm proud to report that it also worked fine, so I now have a nicely printed, matted and framed black & white print. :-)

I must say, it's surprising just how much more 'real' a print looks if it is mounted like this. The difference intuitively shouldn't be so great, but it really does make a lot of difference to the overall impact of the print. The down side is, after just three prints, I've burned a whole afternoon, and I'm really quite physically wiped out. OK, I did a bit of IKEA desk assembling immediately beforehand, but even then, it's definitely made my arms, wrists and hands hurt quite a bit. There's no way I'm ever going to be doing this in any kind of quantity, I'm afraid. I can see why people end up using CNC mat cutting machines if they do any kind of volume these days -- I'd be forced to do the same thing, or face significant RSI problems. *pokes arthritis for making me more susceptible to that kind of thing*
  

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-08 03:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cuthalion.livejournal.com
I've been thinking about doing this for some time now; I have a printer that goes up to 13x19, but haven't found anywhere to get cheap (< $50) frames even close to that size that reasonably accommodate 3:2 photos.

You talked about matting a lot; what did you do for framing?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-08 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] compilerbitch.livejournal.com
The photo club I joined requires competition entries to be matted to an overall size between 11x14 and 16x20, so my thought was pretty simple: print nice and big on 13x19 paper, and cut a 16x20 mat to suit. That means I can also put the same mounted photos in $17, quite nice, off-the-shelf frames. I've only done one so far, and it looks really nice. I tend to shoot with a bit of extra image and crop to suit the thing I'm trying to achieve, so I rarely end up with an aspect ratio that fits with a standard frame size. This is partly because my Bronica/Megavision system gives square, 4000 x 4000 images so usually needs a bit of cropping, and partly because I don't generally use zoom lenses. I've only recently picked up a zoom for the Bronica, and of course there is no such thing as a zoom for the large format system, so I just basically choose a lens wide enough to get everything in and be prepared to crop slighty. The 4x5's native resolution is 8000x6000 anyway, so it's possible to do some pretty extreme cropping and still get a big, sharp print -- I've often found 'photos within photos' that way. The big print I mounted today was basically taken from the bottom quarter of a portrait-orientation landscape image shot with the 4x5, and printed to 13x19 it's still pin sharp. OK, a really good full-frame 8k x 6k image would be sharper still, but you'd probably need a loupe on the print to tell the difference.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-08 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] randwolf.livejournal.com
Sympathies.

You might try University Art for tools and supplies and perhaps even some books; as I recall Aaron Bros. had a pretty limited selection. There used to be a nice frame-it-yourself shop in Mountain View, but it's probably been redeveloped, bleh.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-08 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] compilerbitch.livejournal.com
Aaron Bros. is really a matting/framing specialist, with a big emphasis on the framing. They have a really good selection of frames in Sunnyvale and a reasonable selection of mat board too, but I think a lot of their business probably must be custom framing and selling standard sized frames. Mind you, they do have a very comprehensive selection of frames, including even some very big panorama frames, so they are possibly worth a look.

I don't know of a framing shop locally -- can you remember where it was?

I'll give University Art a try. I need some more mat board, and they look likely to be open tomorrow so I'll check them out. Thanks for the pointer! :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-08 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davefish.livejournal.com
I think that this long and detailed entry about much frustration justifies the fact I go into town and pay someone else to do it every time I need somthing matted. Printing at standard sizes helps, as the CNC mats are pretty reasonably priced.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-10 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-mai.livejournal.com
ooh i want to matt some pictures now!
i dont like xacto knives at all. for sharp fine stuff i always use swann-morton scalpels (10A blades), for heavier work use a stanley knife (ie. straight cutting edges of mats). a decent heavy-duty metal ruler and cutting mat are also essential for making it as less hard work as possible, and least dangerous.
taking a look the Logan thing looks great! (avoids shredding your cutting mat for one) but it shouldn't be that hard work, i dont think. possibly you're pressing too hard on some bits that don't need pressing? having said that 3 mounts is good going for a day. dont try any more than that.
i just picked up my first photos since new year... and they're all crap. balls.

Profile

compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)
compilerbitch

January 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3 45 6789
10111213 141516
17181920212223
24 252627282930
31      
Page generated Mar. 23rd, 2026 10:15 am

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags