Just out of interest, go to the Newsweek site here, take the test and post your score here. If your score isn't shown, round down to the next-lowest value available (sorry, LJ only allows 20 possible levels).
[Poll #947558]
I scored 20, by the way. I saw this originally on
forest's LJ, but thought it might be interesting to post a poll based on it.
[Poll #947558]
I scored 20, by the way. I saw this originally on
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:16 am (UTC)Also I have problems with big groups, so a lot of the questions were skewed depending to how big the groups were.
So the library/party thing I came down on library, but the museum/theatre thing I came down on theatre (except I now realise they may have meant cinema, though I guess I would have said the same). But I think that's because in a library you can be with people in a less threatening way than at a party (either literally threatening at wild parties or internally stressful at staid dos). I've never really liked museums (particularly soc anth) because they're like life with all the people washed away, like after some neutron bomb or something.
I've no idea if this is the sort of thing they had in mind when setting up the questions though.
Btw, have you read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"? I think this is a really good "gateway" or ambiguous or playful book along this axis.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:27 pm (UTC)There's also a correleation between ASD and sensory integration dysfunction. Often people with ASD are sensory-sensitive to noise [ie. over-react to a given noise] and will thus prefer libraries to parties because they're quieter/have fewer people in them.
I can't remember what I picked re library and party - it would depend on whose party and what type of party. I like gatherings of people to talk, eat food and drink a little with quiet background music. I don't like noisy parties where people dance rather than talk.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:45 am (UTC)I did it again, trying to remember what I was like around 2000, and got an 8 which seems very low.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:46 am (UTC)If I assume CFS symptoms to be a part of me and answer accordingly: 34
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 03:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 05:02 am (UTC)It's definitely not very specific and does not account for the effects of life experiences.
And of course(here's the thing with internet quizzes) it doesn't account for the difference between how you see yourself and how others see you.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 05:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 06:25 am (UTC)Yep.
And in my case I find I need things to be the same in order to conserve my energy. (A mere change of scenery and I'm dazed and confused). So the test doesn't pick up on the motivation to behave in certain ways. Presumably if one is autistic, certain behaviours are the default option regardless of life experience.
The thing about being able to do public speaking but freaking out about supermarkets and such, makes perfect sense to me. (I have a few social anxiety problems, always had them but they're excacerbated by illness, but a greater level of comfort with public speaking than most people. I kind of enjoy it.)
I suspect it's because when I'm doing something that counts as public speaking, I feel I have control that I don't have in other situations. I have prepared what I'm going to say, I know what I'm talkign about and I don't have to try and work out how much to say and when to say it. Also, I don't have to struggle for attention (big problem for me, I'm really good at saying stuff and being ignored for some reason.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 02:35 am (UTC)Anyway. I got 29, which I suspect is linked to my experiences in Russia. They've definately made me more cynical and introverted.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 02:42 am (UTC)I have to say I don't quite understand what this means. I don't know much about autism, and nothing about Asperger's...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:25 am (UTC)Aspergers people are normal to high IQ, autistic tend to be low IQ. As children they are hard to relate to (interpersonal skills being not there) they don't empathise, and they might go round collecting things in categories - such as a list of everyones birthdays, or the bus number people arrive to school on, and want to collect the Entire List.
They will fail tests like 'what do you think is in this tube of smarties little freddie?"
"Smarties!" says Freddie
tester: "oh no, look, it's a pen!"
tester: "now freddie, what do you think Bert over there who'd not been watching will say when I ask him what's in the smarties tube?"
If freddie is autistic he'll say 'A pen!' (assuming bert has the knowledge he has now)
If freddie isn't autistic and is old enough (eg over five I think) he'll say 'Smarties!' (realising that bert will have no reason to assume there is a pen in the smarties tube and isn't pyschic etc)
Something like that anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:42 pm (UTC)I got the e-mail though, and Sarah has now un-screened it.
Thanks!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 02:46 pm (UTC)Glad I didn't retype it! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:35 am (UTC)grr computers don't like me this morning.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:42 am (UTC)I think I'd have scored a lot more a few years ago, before I made the group of friends I have at present - since hanging out with these folks, my social energy has quadrupled, and I actually enjoy being around people more than two nights a week, whereas in the past it would have made me curl into a ball and hide.
I assume if anyone who is moderately antisocial for whatever reason takes the test, they come out as fairly Aspie...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 10:22 am (UTC)I scored 15, but even 6 mths ago I think I would have scored a lot higher due to my social anxiety. Its also totally mitigated by my utter inability to grasp anything involving numbers and other pattern-recognition based questions as I am useless - my brain just doesn't like it. I think I also score relatively lowly because, due to social anxiety stuff, I am always hyper aware of people around me and very conscious of their body language/ facial expressions etc. which is the total opposite of any autistic/ asperger's related behaviour.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:00 am (UTC)And I think I got about 35 doing something similar elsewhere. (with the same sort of scoring mechanism)
I think I scored too high due to self image and things though... (I tend to be pessimistic on things like this...)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:33 am (UTC)As a teenager, I'd have answered more positively; I was then fascinated by some of the more obvious ASD-related entries in the test, e.g. numbers, and I did indeed go through a phase, when I was about eleven or twelve, of collecting car registration plates—I had a log book which I noted down every one I saw in. (As a child, I went through a phase of simply counting, and got to one and a half million before I got bored.) Taking the test again and answering as I would have as a teenager, I scored 35.
I don't know what it says about your f-list that the mean of your respondents' answers is considerably higher than the average they report in the test...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 09:51 am (UTC)But on the subject of question interpretation, the words themselves cause me some problems, phrases like 'I find it difficult to work out peoples intentions' are hard to parse. At one level everyone should agree with that. It is always hard, none of us are telepathic. On the other hand, clearly some of us find it easier to work out (or at least think we do) than others. I'd put myself in that camp, but if I answered the question literally I'd have to say 'strongly agree'.
Of course taking things literally is often a trait of ASD so maybe that isn't too much of a problem. And as the test says, it can't be used as a diagnostic tool for individuals.
I must admit I'm suspicious of the work of the Cambridge group and their attempts to link ASD in with the much wider phenomena of social anxiety and ritualistic thinking. I know they are trying to normalise ASD which is very worthy, but I can't help thinking that in the process they pathologise fairly normal dimensions of human experience.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 10:41 am (UTC)i might get the boy to take it. i imagine he'd score quite high. he's just a little bit misanthropic. overall i don't think it's a very telling test.
BTW what's PTSD mean?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:35 pm (UTC):)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 04:16 pm (UTC)I got 21 - I dunno, I'm a reasonably sociable person and not the sort to be anxious at all, but I happen to like numbers and patterns.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 10:49 am (UTC)I wonder how (if at all) this "autism quotient" maps against MBTI types.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 12:23 pm (UTC)This is lower than I expected, and notable lower than it was when I took the text a year or so ago, when I was having more trouble with the anxiety disorder than I do now.
It would also be interesting to note how my answers would change were I well enough to be out and about every day - I tend towards feeling sociable as a rule because getting to see people is something of a rarity for me. On the other hand, some of my score might be affected in the autism direction because of the M.E.
If I do make a complete or near-complete recovery and start working or training full-time, I must remember to take the test again and see.
This is a very interesting poll. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 01:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 05:01 pm (UTC)Got 27, BTW. Would possibly score higher if I didn't have a PTSD issue that means I attempt to randomise routes, times and activities to avoid ambush.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:55 pm (UTC)Thing is since leaving school I don't have social anxiety and didn't have it much at school. It's just I don't find people that interesting a lot of the time. I can identify with not finding fiction that interesting. Sometimes I try and push myself to read literature but most of the time it doesn't work. When I do it tends to be sci-fi.
Still 37 is rather high considering I have not got an official diagnosis, but I reckon its not that uncommon amongst physicists.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:20 pm (UTC)Lots of things cause people to have 'ASD'y scores using questionnaires.
People who have language disorders and hearing impairments can present with similar difficulties to those with ASD because they haven't been able to access enough language to learn social skills/non-verbal communication the way people without language disorders or hearing impairments do.
I can see how PTSD could cause ASD-like symptoms.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-18 09:40 am (UTC)