North Korea appear to have detonated a nuclear device. The US Geological Survey say they didn't pick anything up, but the South Koreans reckon that they picked up a 3.9 tremor from a remote region of North Korea.
Probably not a very big one, and most likely a partial detonation (fizzle). But not particularly great news...
Edit: USGS confirmed 4.2 on the Richter scale, which puts the detonation (extrapolating from published data on US nuclear tests in Nevada) of the order of 10-15 kilotons, so it is just about possible that they are pulling a fast one and it wasn't nuclear at all, but it's also in the same range as the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombs from WW II, so it's credible that it may have been a for-real, probably fairly unsophisticated, A-bomb.
Edit: MSNBC are saying 550 ton equivalent, about a third of my estimate. That might be wishful thinking -- it doesnt sound like enough te generate a 4.2 tremor.
Probably not a very big one, and most likely a partial detonation (fizzle). But not particularly great news...
Edit: USGS confirmed 4.2 on the Richter scale, which puts the detonation (extrapolating from published data on US nuclear tests in Nevada) of the order of 10-15 kilotons, so it is just about possible that they are pulling a fast one and it wasn't nuclear at all, but it's also in the same range as the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombs from WW II, so it's credible that it may have been a for-real, probably fairly unsophisticated, A-bomb.
Edit: MSNBC are saying 550 ton equivalent, about a third of my estimate. That might be wishful thinking -- it doesnt sound like enough te generate a 4.2 tremor.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 04:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 04:34 am (UTC)btw, I looked for that my frame shop on Google; it's not there anymore. It may have been succeeded by "Frame Art Workshop & Gallery" or "Art & Frames Unlimited".
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 09:58 am (UTC)It's not that serious incompetence I believe when you are playing with Plutonium bombs rather than Uranium.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 05:22 am (UTC)It doesn't surprise me that they didn't succeed, but scary all the same...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 09:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 10:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 09:58 am (UTC)It's not - but it might have generated the 3.8/3.9 that was picked up early on.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-09 05:16 pm (UTC)