compilerbitch: That's me, that is! (Default)
compilerbitch ([personal profile] compilerbitch) wrote2006-08-13 02:04 am

[personal profile] compilerbitch goes to Yosemite

I'm in a motel room just south of Yosemite, after a long afternoon of photography.

Yosemite is truly spectacular -- I can really see what people see in the place now, having visited it. I am very lucky to live within half a day's drive of the park, and I seriously doubt that this will be my last visit!

We arrived quite late, it being a long way from Mountain View and all. I ended up setting up at two locations, spending about 2-3 hours at the first one and half an hour at the second one. I'm getting quicker with the large format camera, but I'm finding that the best results come from *not* rushing it. It takes about 20 minutes to set up from scratch, including setting up the tripod, opening the two flight cases, setting up the laptop and scanning back, attaching the view camera to the tripod, zeroing all the movements (both standards have four degrees of freedom, so you have to set them all parallel and in sensible positions before you start), and levelling everything with a spirit level. Then I decide on the shot I want, put one of the four different focal length lenses on it (these were all shot with a 150mm Nikkor-W), focus, adjust the camera movements so I get exactly what I want, check the focus again, lock everything down tightly, stop the lens down to somewhere between f11 and f32, put one or other of the infrared filters in the compendium shade and attach it in front of the lens, put the digital back in, do a quick test scan, check the focus yet again (the back has a facility for this which works extremely well), set the exposure, do another test scan just to be sure, then make the final scan -- so far, we're at about 35-40 minutes, not including however long the scan takes.

An afternoon of photography got me 15 exposures, a few of which were just duplicates I made as a second scan just in case something had gone wrong with the first one (if it takes so long to set up the shot, it would be stupid to lose it all by being careless at the end). I generally made two colour exposures (which I later often convert to black & white) and one or two infrared exposures at each setup, of which I think I did about four. Anyway, here are the 4 photos that I've sorted out for printing so far (I have about another 3 or maybe 4 from today's shooting that still need doing).

Bear in mind that these are 640x480 reductions -- the original images are all 8000x6000. Printed bigger than A4, this works out as so sharp that the resolution of the print exceeds the resolution of my eyes. I can't wait to get back home and print them. The visual impact of this kind of print is hard to explain, and impossible to demonstrate without actually viewing a physical print. I had hoped that the BetterLight system would make it possible for me to get to the level of image quality I'd always aspired to but never quite attained -- in practice, it has done that so well that it really is out of the other side.

Tomorrow, we're off to Mono Lake, via Yosemite again. I want to try to get a better vantage point to shoot Half Dome (you can see it in the far distance on the distant monochrome shot), and Caroline wants to go to the visitors centre and (both of us) want to visit the Ansel Adams gallery. We attempted that today, but the sheer number of visitors made it impossible to get anywhere near it -- parking was virtually impossible, so we decided to go and take photos instead. If I'm not too dead tomorrow night, I'll upload a few more from tomorrow's shooting.

Anyway, without further ado, here are the photos:


El Capitain in Colour



El Capitain in Monochrome


El Capitain in Infrared


El Capitain and Half Dome in Monochrome

[identity profile] davefish.livejournal.com 2006-08-13 10:00 am (UTC)(link)
First up, the photographs are really great. Although they are quite a small resolution, you've done a good job in the reduction in keeping the feeling off sharpness. I know from what I do there's a huge loss of impact when reducing sizes, so I would love to see an original.

You do have a very long setup process, but I suppose that there is inherent with the method, you're using to take the images. Are you going to experiment with large prints? I recently did some images at 20 x 30 inches, I thought they came out quite well despite the low resolution off my sources. I'm sure they will be absolutely amazing, should you do them with some of these images

Good luck with the next set of photographs today.

[identity profile] randwolf.livejournal.com 2006-08-13 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Great stuff; these are some of the classic subjects and you're doing well by them.

[identity profile] talsha.livejournal.com 2006-08-14 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
Cool pics!

Yosemite is awesome, you are lucky to live so close to it. Enjoy the visit to Mono Lake.

Have you been to Monterey and Big Sur yet?

[identity profile] mostlyacat.livejournal.com 2006-08-15 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Hail the photos.
And yay for extreme effort photography vs point and click.

[identity profile] kylecassidy.livejournal.com 2006-10-16 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
you make me wish that i wasn't too lazy to use my 4x5.